2024-10-28
任务内容
一、会议信息
2024年航空航天、机械与材料工程国际学术会议 (AMME 2024)
2024 International Conference on Aerospace, Mechanical and Materials Engineering
大会官网：www.ic-amme.com
时间地点：2024年10月25-27日；西安-线下会议
需领取津贴结算任务的主讲嘉宾：
刘尧龙教授，浙江大学航空航天学院；
李兆凯副教授，长安大学；
二、角色要求、职责及权益：
√代表有该要求或权益；△表示自由选择是否履行该职责；×表示无该要求或权益
三、合作流程：
1.知晓相关权益及要求，领取任务;
2.组委会将通过邮件颁发相关证书，并告知会议相关信息:
3.审核完毕，完成任务。
4.会后领取结算任务单，进行津贴结算
四、会议秘书联系方式
严老师
电话/微信：18124945342
联系邮箱：yanxiangru@ais.cn
同行预审任务须知
编辑对评析的专业内容从完整性和参考价值两方面来评价报告的实用性评分，无专业性内容的报告会被否决，任务终止。
【Ⅰ】0.2分/项，次要评析内容，共8项；
【Ⅱ】0.4分/项，重要评析内容，共3项；
【Ⅲ】0.8分/项，重要评析内容，共3项，需从写作逻辑结构和研究主题两方面对文章进行评析，体现专业度，如果只评析了一个方面仅得0.4分/项。
需在相关部分对文章的写作逻辑结构、研究主题和其他问题3项内容提出修改建议，体现专业度，修改建议分为笼统、清晰及详细3个等级，分别对应为0、1及2分。
7天内返回该报告。必要时，须在时限内联系编辑申请延期，无故延期或超期限完成，任务都可能被终止。
专家也可用个人习惯的评审方式来评析文章（如，在原文批注等），但须包含报告所涉及的各方面内容，完成后，请打包压缩所有相关文件，上传至艾思科蓝系统。
报告总评分低于6分时，编辑可能提出返修，返修1次后仍未能达到要求，报告将被否决，任务终止。任务在验收前被终止的，没有任何报酬或奖励
Instructions for Reviewers
The report will be evaluated by its integrity and reference value. Should no professional guidance be provided in the report, the report will be rejected and the task will be terminated
[Ⅰ]. 0.2 point / item (8 items in total), items of secondary importance;
[Ⅱ]. 0.4 point / item (3 items in total), items of primary importance;
[Ⅲ]. 0.8 point / item (3 items in total), items of primary importance; assessment and comments on these items need to be made from two aspects: the logical flow in writing and the research topic, and only 0.4 point will be given if either aspect is not evaluated.
You need to provide professional modification suggestions based on the logical flow in writing, research topic and other issues regarding the manuscript. Modification suggestions are divided into three levels: general, clear, and detailed, which deserve 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively.
You need to return the completed report within 7 days. If necessary, contact the editor to apply for an extension of the deadline. For any breach of the agreed deadline in other cases, the task will be terminated and no remuneration for the task in question will be provided
You are free to review manuscripts by your personal habits (e. g., making revisions or leaving comments in the original text), but the evaluation needs to cover all items listed in the report. After completion, please compress all relevant documents and upload the compressed file (zip./rar.) to the AIS system
Instruction to Editors
It is a pleasure to work with you on this project. Your returned manuscript will be assessed from the four dimensions listed below. One star is assigned to each dimension. If the requirements in the dimension are met, one star will be given. Experts winning more stars for a project are likely to have a rise in remuneration and more chances for future collaborations.
| Star | Evaluation Dimension | Specific requirements |
|---|---|---|
|
Grammar, punctuation, style, and format |
|
|
|
Technical accuracy |
|
|
|
Presentation and logic improvement | Improve wording and phrasing to improve readability; Restructure sentences, provide necessary conjunctions, and adjust the order of paragraphs to improve the logical flow. |
|
|
Content-related comments |
|
|
|
Cooperation | Provide timely response to inquiries from our in-house editors or authors; Provide on-going support for revision. |
We are committed to 100% on-time delivery of work to our authors. Please carefully read the Project Overview and Details, especially the "deadline" and "remuneration", to check whether you are available for the project before you click "accept". If you need an extension of the deadline, please inform us by mail, WeChat, or other contacts available at least one working day in advance to reset the deadline. Any breach of the agreed deadline in other cases is likely to incur deduction in remuneration.
Given concerns for academic integrity and transparency of publishing, we do not encourage our editors to use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in editing projects. These technologies can be used for grammar, spelling checks, reference editing or management. Editors who use these technologies in editing projects should carefully check the content generated or edited by generative AI and AI-assisted tools to ensure that the content is verifiable, accurate, and remains true to the author’s intended meaning; the completed project should be within the acceptable range of AI rate required by the publishing house. Editors should avoid excessive use of AI tools that may cause complaints from authors, or revision or rejection decisions from publishing houses.
论文翻译任务须知
本任务将按如下指标进行评估验收。每个评估指标占一颗星，满足该项指标得一颗星，未满足则该项不得星。任务所得星数越高，成为优质专家的几率越大。优质专家将有机会获得更高的稿酬与更高的派稿频率。
| 星级 | 指标 | 详情 | 具体指标 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
语言质量 | 评估终稿1）是否随意增译漏译；2）是否有严重机翻；3）是否有语法、大小写、标点等问题、4）行文是否流畅 |
|
|
|
术语准确性 | 评估终稿中术语是否准确、是否全文一致 |
|
|
|
文风、格式 | 评估终稿是否符合科技论文格式与文风 |
|
|
|
专业意见 | 评估专家是否提供专业内容上、论文框架等提供意见 |
|
|
|
配合度 | 评估专家是否在稿件存在问题时，积极回应，是否配合返修 |
|
上述指标主要用于评估稿件质量与专家配合度。时效性为额外的评估维度。专家需按照任务详情页的“截止日期/deadline”，及时反馈稿件。因特殊原因无法及时反馈的，需至少提前1个工作日告知编辑（联系方式在任务详情页），申请延期。无故延期或超期限完成，且未告知编辑的，对应任务可能将被终止。
出于学术诚信与出版透明的考虑，我们不鼓励专家在处理稿件时过度依赖生成式AI或AI辅助技术。专家可以使用AI工具可以用于语法、拼写检查、文献管理和编辑。专家在使用AI工具协助处理稿件时，必须对AI生成或编辑的内容进行检查，确保所生成的内容真实、准确、不偏离作者原意、并将AI率控制在出版社能接受的范围内。专家应尽量避免因使用AI工具造成作者投诉、出版社返修、拒稿等，减少返修或任务终止的情况。
校对任务
本任务将按如下指标进行评估验收。每个评估指标占一颗星，满足该项指标得一颗星，未满足则该项不得星。任务所得星数越高，成为优质专家的几率越大。优质专家将有机会获得更高稿酬的合作机会与更高的派稿频率。
| 星级 | 维度 | 具体指标 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
拼写、冠词、标点、空格、基础语法 |
|
|
论文格式 | 校正了文内引用格式、专业缩写、参考文献等问题 |
| 悬挂句、祈使句、句意不清等 | 修正了悬挂句、无主语句、句意不清等问题 | |
|
|
重复内容、逻辑修正 | 删除了重复的单词、句段；改善了句段逻辑，对缺失成分的句子进行了批注 |
|
|
配合度 | 能回应作者或质检编辑提出的问题；能积极配合返修 |
上述指标主要用于评估稿件质量与专家配合度。时效性为额外的评估维度。专家需按照任务详情页的“截止日期/deadline”，及时反馈稿件。因特殊原因无法及时反馈的，需至少提前1个工作日告知编辑（联系方式在任务详情页），申请延期。无故延期或超期限完成，且未告知编辑的，对应任务可能将被终止。
出于学术诚信与出版透明的考虑，我们不鼓励专家在处理稿件时过度依赖生成式AI或AI辅助技术。专家可以使用AI工具可以用于语法、拼写检查、文献管理和编辑。专家在使用AI工具协助处理稿件时，必须对AI生成或编辑的内容进行检查，确保所生成的内容真实、准确、不偏离作者原意、并将AI率控制在出版社能接受的范围内。专家应尽量避免因使用AI工具造成作者投诉、出版社返修、拒稿等，减少返修或任务终止的情况。
